I ran across a really disturbing post on That Forum last night.
A single woman posted that she was TTC and was seriously considering using DE or donor embryo. Okay, fine, that’s all kosher if you’re up for that.
The next thing I read didn’t just floor me, it upset me: for her sperm donor, she is considering using her brother. Her. Brother.
There is nothing you could ever say to convince me that this is any different from essentially copulating with your sibling.
I was horrified and I thought that it must be a troll on the forum, trying to have some fun. So I posted a rather snarky reply which included a comment that this is essentially incest.
And then I deleted it. Not because I changed my mind, because it occurred to me that this poor thing either did not understand how DE works, or somehow didn’t understand that she would putting her brother’s sperm (in the form of a fertilized embryo) into her body.
And then I decided that it was just too icky and that I didn’t want to post at all on that subject.
And then I got a surprise: when I checked back a few minutes later, I found that the moderator had deleted her original post and apologized for my ‘cruel’ comment.
Huh?
And since then, several other women have posted ’support’ for this woman to have a genetic connection with her child using a sibling’s sperm. Did I mention that in her original post, she made reference to her brother’s ‘gorgeous eyes’ and how she’d love for her child to have those. There is an undertone of inappropriateness that came through that was really disturbing.
Excuse me? You’re talking about a woman creating a child with her brother’s sperm. What is it about unnatural unions and incest that you don’t understand?
Okay, technically, she is not having sex with her brother so it’s not incest per se. But it’s unnatural. You cannot tell me otherwise. Sisters should not give birth to their brother’s child, even if it’s only a half-child. They should not, for that matter, give birth to their uncle or their father’s child. A baby’s father (even if only genetic) should not also be his grandfather, uncle or brother, genetic or otherwise.
I was truly shocked and stunned to see these poeple flocking to her side to give support and suggesting that I should apologize. Okay, I was snarky; bad girl. But telling her that it was okay to do this?
So then I started googling the crap out of intra-family sperm donation… and I found a lot of post and references to it. Maybe not tons, but a lot. And while I understand the desire to have a genetic connection… this is just going too far.
Yes, but, sister and nieces and aunts donate eggs and nobody cares about that, right? Well, yes and no. Personally speaking, I’m more comfortable with an outside donor than someone in the family. It would be too much like my husband having had sex with another woman in my family. Call me too literal, but I just can’t see it any other way. And I still find the concept of a niece’s genetic mother being also being her niece, etc., pretty distasteful as well. And even if you did go that route, women cannot impregnate each other so the taboo factor isn’t there. It is definitely there with a male family member who has a genetic link to the woman TTC. That is an unholy union that should not happen. Period. And I think because of the fact that there is no real distinction between a genetic and biological father, it makes the whole thing even more disturbing.
Why should I care about what other people are doing to make their happy families? I care because I am now part of this generation (or two) or women who are pioneering conception via gamete donation and it upsets me to see lines being blurred. Because I think that is what is going on here. While those of us going through this like to comfort ourselves with the fact that we are the biological mothers, you cannot deny the genetic link. You cannot erase it, and I believe, you shouldn’t blur lines about the truth to get what you want, soothe your bruised infertile ego or make your in-laws happy, etc.
I can’t imagine the mindfuck that a child conceived this way would go through. And that’s assuming they are told as a huge percentage of DE children are never told of their origins, a fact which is equally as disturbing to me.
This all brings up other issues that are more political in nature that I don’t really want to go into here, but it has to do a trend of ‘right way’ thinking that I’ve seen building in this country for a long, long time. And I see it throughout the political spectrum. Call it propaganda, call it brain-washing but it’s a disturbing tendency that I see in people to subscribe to a party line and not dare to waiver from it. I’ve never studied sociology but I suppose there is a need to belong to groups that drives this. And that’s what I saw on That Forum — a bunch of women jumping in who weren’t really thinking about what they were saying. Because if you stop to actually think about what it would mean to conceive using a male family member’s sperm… it should stop you dead in your tracks, if you have your head on straight.
I don’t know what it is* in my DNA that bothers me so much about ‘right way thinking’, but it does. Bothers the DH too. We’ve had many a discussion about this and both agree. What is interesting here is that he was not born here and noticed it after a year or so of living here. And, to add a data point to my observation, an acquaintance from Scotland that I was doing music with for a while noticed the exact same thing. He found it really irritating and confounding to see Americans do this. For all our talk of freedom and liberty, we seem a little afraid to practice it. Or to speak our dissension aloud without being attacked or marginalized.
Some people might read this and think how full of judgment I am, etc. Yeah, I tried that for a while, not judging, etc. And I find that the older I get, the more I prefer to call a spade a spade. And I guess that’s what I’m doing here.
And if this post doesn’t get me some comments or lose some readers (or both), I don’t know what will… lol.
*Update: I actually do know what it is. It’s the ‘here’s how you should think’ aspect that, frankly, borders on fascism. I live in a very liberal area of the country, and I see a lot of people subscribe to a certain way of thinking that is supposed to be ‘right’ and ‘just’ and ‘fair.’ And before I get accused of being the next Dick Cheney (which I assure you I am not), I see people on the right doing the same thing. It’s the fear or inability to think (and speak!) freely without fear of rejection, criticism, or attack etc., that is so disturbing.
Well, it will get you a comment, but you won’t lose me as a reader.
I don’t have a problem with the woman using her brother. Now, I don’t have a brother and if I did maybe I would feel differently. I would have also loved to used my sister as an egg donor although she wasn’t comfortable with it.
In my opinion, in order to move ahead with DE, I had to separate sex from procreation and “mother” from “genetic contributor”.
If I were in that woman’s position, I would tell the child that her uncle was the genetic contributor and not the father. I would explain that it was a way to have a genetic link with me, the child’s mother and in a way, it is my genes via a circuitous route.
I am not saying this because I am afraid to have a contrary opinion. In fact, I have a post up on my blog right now that is contrary to most people’s opinions.
I can understand your point of view, I just have another.
By: Kami on June 16, 2009
at 9:13 pm
If she was using her own egg, it would freak me out. But if she’s using an egg donor, I don’t see the “weirdness” in using her brother’s sperm. Sorry.
As someone who conceived with donor sperm, I quite frankly have to tell you that it’s laughable to suggest that my insemination was anything kin (forgive the pun) to having sex with donor #208. It’s just genetic information, one million times removed from the sex act.
I’m not with you on this one.
Being inseminated, or doing IVF, is not the same as sex. I don’t see the connection, and I don’t understand your fear that this practice somehow blurs the line of right and wrong. If we’re going to go down that road, nearly every procedure relating to ART has denegrated as dangerous to society.
Sorry to get ruffled, but (clearly) this hits home for me. I think the “mind-fuck” accusation is unnecessarily unkind.
-D.
By: D. on June 16, 2009
at 10:20 pm
Hi D… and I would reply to you that your insemination with donor #208 is not at all what I’m talking about. If donor #208 was your brother (or other male family member with whom you share DNA), then my post would be referring to you. And I would stand by my statements that it is unhealthy and wrong.
I think you need to re-read my post.
Thanks for stopping by.
By: onwardandsideways on June 16, 2009
at 11:30 pm
wow just wow. I’m glad when the first donor gave that very first egg or sperm that the governing bodies didn’t think the same way you do. “incest” pffft
I think you need to sit down and think about if you are prepared for posting posts such as this one and then being all uppity when someone comments that you don’t agree with. lets see I’ll tell myself thanks for stopping by and to reread your post, don’t worry I wont be back I prefer my bloggers to not be so Amish.
By: Peta on June 16, 2009
at 11:47 pm
Hi Peta… it’s interesting to me that you think I am being ‘uppity’ in my reply to D. Also interesting to me is that you, too, have clearly not understood my post. You might try re-reading it and see if you can understand what I’m saying. You don’t have to agree with it, of course. But before you accuse me of anything, you need to understand what my position is, and show me that you do in your response. Otherwise, you just look like you’re attacking me very much in the way that I referred to at the end of my post.
Thanks for stopping by though. Oh, and for the record, I’m not being ‘uppity’ with you either. This is how I write. Take it or leave it.
By: onwardandsideways on June 16, 2009
at 11:56 pm
You sound like a right-wing religious conservative nut job. And to think you also wrote about the people who refuse to stray from their party lines. Hello, Pot, have you met Kettle?
By: SnickerDoodle on June 17, 2009
at 12:09 am
@SnickerDoodle I’m actually not. Far from it, as a matter of fact. You, however, sound quite a bit like the people I’m referring to at the end of my post. Funny how they seem to be cropping up here…
By: onwardandsideways on June 17, 2009
at 12:22 am
My only experience with this topic is with an acquaintance. Her sister couldn’t have children because of severe endo and early menopause, so they needed both a surrogate and an egg donor. This acquaintance of mine volunteered to be both. She was inseminated with her brother-in-laws sperm and gave birth to her biological child and niece.
Interestingly, I’ve never considered the moral/ethical ramifications of this. I know her sister was overjoyed and the child is thriving. I think after the treatment choices we’ve made, I’ve shut down my judgment of others and their fertility choices.
Write whatever you wish – it’s your blog! Of course I’ll still read even if I disagree. How is anyone suppose to grow if they turn their backs to differing opinions? I never understand that approach.
By: Christina (Retrogirl) on June 17, 2009
at 12:31 am
Hey Christina… thanks for responding without attacking. Some sanity!
And it’s interesting to me that you say you’ve never thought about it… which is I think is key to this discussion (assuming it doesn’t degenerate any further than it has, lol.) I feel very strongly that while conception via donor gametes is perfectly okay, we took a step too far by allowing donors to have a genetic connection to the recipient. Just because we CAN do it doesn’t make it right, or a good idea.
There are certainly all kinds of opinions about the purpose of ART, but I think forging ahead without considering these moral and ethical ramifications is really dangerous. We may not see it or feel it today… but it may come back to bite us hard in the behind one day.
And on a grander scale, I think there are broader ramifications to the whole issue. The ‘blurring of lines’ about right and wrong that I think sometimes gets very, very fuzzy especially when championed by people of various political persuasions. I’m being very vague here, because this is really my DE blog, not a political blog. But I do think these are really important questions that are too easily swept under the carpet and branded as ‘okay’… simply because we can do it. It’s almost as if we make it right, acceptable and okay BECAUSE of the fact that we can do it. And that, I believe, is very, very dangerous.
Anyway, thanks for your comments, as always. Can’t wait to read about your trip, hope it was great!
By: onwardandsideways on June 17, 2009
at 12:39 am
I agree that if it were her own eggs, then there’s a problem there and the children born as a result could have serious issues (check the history of European royalty).
If she’s using DE, however, then she has an opportunity to feel a genetic connection with the child. While I won’t get this opportunity myself, everything I had read and all the counselors I have spoken with say that it may be easier on the child feel truly part of the family. If I had a sister, I would definitely ask her for help. I have a brother, but sperm is not our issue so that thought never even entered my mind.
In the bible (not that I am religious), if a man died with no heirs, his brother was to impregnate the widow and the child would be raised as the dead man’s child. Now I know this is different from what this woman is doing butI feel ok with her decision- and I respect your feelings to the contrary.
By: Lisa DG on June 17, 2009
at 1:22 am
HA! Oh shit – you’re going to HATE my reply here (though I do love your thought-provoking posts – seriously!).
I really see no difference whatsoever in using a brother to create an embryo (provided the egg isn’t yours) than it is to use a sister to create the embryo with your husband’s sperm. I realize it’s repugnant to you on a moral level but, strictly speaking from a genetic standpoint, there is absolutely zero difference.
Having said that, I’m personally uncomfortable with both scenarios. True, I don’t have siblings and maybe I’d feel differently if I did. But even if my cousin wanted to donate her eggs to me, I would have turned her down flat – truly!
I really don’t like the idea of a friend/family being the genetic “parent” of my child. I think the lines of parenting could get fuzzy within the family unit and, from my perspective, it’s more likely to cause serious strife than using an agency or anonymous donor.
This genetic shit is hard enough without having to explain to my child that their aunt Marie is their genetic mother or uncle Bob . . . well, you get it. I would rather leave it as “this really wonderful lady helped me . . . ”
(I also understand that you’re envisioning a man’s sperm inside his sister and the taboo of that is hard to get by – granted. But it’s not even his sperm at the IVF stage, it’s an embryo that’s already been created in the lab)
By: Sky on June 17, 2009
at 1:28 am
Sky, I never hate your replies. Ever. Don’t break your record (kidding!!)
But you hit on one of the finer points of this exactly: the fuzzy lines of an aunt who is also a genetic mother. You can’t tell me that’s not fuzzy.
And yeah, you can gloss over it, and everybody can say ‘it’s okay, it’s a genetic connection, etc.’ But I really think that’s a little too much gloss. It feels wrong in every fiber of my being to have an aunt/mother or a brother/father. It doesn’t matter if they aren’t biological fathers or mothers.
And I think a further danger is teaching a CHILD to gloss over these issues and facts. ‘Don’t pay attention to that… it’s just the man behind the green curtain.’
And just to disagree with you a tad… it may be an embryo, but it came from the sperm. And it contains the genetic makeup of the sister’s brother. And when you put that back into a her body, I do think there is a taboo that is broken.
The problem here is that we are not talking about ears, arms and legs. We are talking about life which can only be created (sans ART) through sex. I think we are denying and/or forgetting some fundamental truths when we say that it’s okay to create life this way.
Anyway, thanks so much for posting. I think I’m being followed from That Forum. Who are these people? And can they have a discussion without flame-throwing? Sheesh.Anyone who’s read this blog for a while knows I voted for Obama (not that I follow HIS party line, either, I just think he was a superb candidate and a hell of a lot better than the ‘Grandpa and the Beauty Queen’ option on the other side. LOL)
By: onwardandsideways on June 17, 2009
at 1:52 am
Hey, I totally hear ya. I’m not down with the whole brother-was-my-sperm-donor either (fking hell if that doesn’t sound like a Jerry Springer episode!). I’m just saying it’s not different from using a sister as an egg donor on any level (functional, genetic, societal), that’s all. And if a woman is okay with using a sister’s egg to create an embryo then, technically, there can be no logical reason why that’s one iota different from using her brother’s egg to create an embryo (again, providing the egg wasn’t hers – or her sister’s). Of course, everyone’s allowed to set their own gag-o-meters differently.
I’m just super glad I didn’t have to deal with any of that. I like it nice and clean (well…as “clean” as DE/DS can be, anyway
Do I think that maybe, just maybe, this entire field hasn’t gotten really carried away? Yeah, I wonder it often. Somewhere between unplugging blocked fallopian tubes and prescribing some Clomid and transferring a leftover embryo that your parents created (thereby birthing your genetic sibling) is probably an enormous crevasse. There WILL be a backlash at some point – mark my words! And don’t think for an instant I’m going easy on myself ’cause I’m not exactly lily white here. I’m a single 42 year old woman hoping to conceive a baby that will be completely unrelated to me. I’m hardly on the “minimal assistance” end of things.
By: Sky on June 17, 2009
at 3:01 am
Couldn’t agree with you more, Sky, that there’s going to be some kind of backlash to this.
And my real fear (are you listening, those of you who are calling me a ‘right wing nut job’??) is that the right wing freaks are going to get a hold of the exact same issue that I’m posting about and use as fodder to get the whole industry shut down. And if anyone thinks that can’t happen, they should read up on the laws that were up for debate in Georgia this year regarding DE/donor embryo. I don’t know if they were passed, but the very fact that they were brought up not just for discussion but to be VOTED on by the legislators smells like the first rumblings of a storm cloud to me.
By: onwardandsideways on June 17, 2009
at 6:43 am
Interesting topic. I respect your views, but choose to disagree. I don’t really feel like I have enough brain power left tonight to comment beyond that, but trust you will allow me my beliefs just as I am interested in learning about yours.
By: Tonya on June 17, 2009
at 4:43 am
You can believe anything you want to, a feel free to voice it here. The only law here is no flame-throwing.
By: onwardandsideways on June 17, 2009
at 6:46 am
Just a follow up to let you know that I wasn’t offended by your response. I don’t think I misread your post, either, however. You mention that you felt like having a sister or niece or other relation donate eggs would be too much like your husband cheating on you with someone in your family. So I drew the allusion of ART = a sex act from that.
You also said that you were more OK with a woman donating eggs to her sister/niece/whatever because a woman can’t impregnate a woman. Again, this underscored the idea of ART as sex for me. I mean, if a woman carries her sister’s egg, she is still giving birth to her biological niece, just the same as if she was carrying her brother’s sperm. But you have more of a problem with the brother scenario. I (perhaps wrongly) concluded that the problem you had was the sexual connotations of such a situation.
Clearly, I drew inferences from your thoughts that you did not mean to put out there. Still, I think it’s an interpretation issue- not that I was a lazy reader.
I’ve been a reader for a long time, actually, but because the road to TTC #2 has been all but blocked, it’s been hard for me to comment on IF blogs recently.
You view the genetic connection differently than I do. Thankfully, in this country, that’s perfectly ok. I wish you the best of luck, but (still) respectfully disagree.
-D.
By: D. on June 17, 2009
at 6:04 am
Hi D… since we’re clarifying, some comments to your comment:
- I did not say that I felt that a female sibling donating an egg would feel like ‘cheating.’ I said it would feel like my husband had sex with her. That’s somewhat different from cheating for me. I could almost understand cheating, in a way. It would involve a sex act that is natural (although upsetting and obviously something I wouldn’t want him to do. And thankfully, something I don’t think he would do, even if he was tempted.) While it would certainly stir up feelings of jealousy for him to have sex with a female family member in order for us to conceive, the bigger issue for me is the unnatural aspect of doing that in order to conceive that I find really distasteful.
- I did not say that I am more comfortable with a female sibling donating an egg. I am actually not at all comfortable with that, and I am against intrafamily gamete donation for society in general. And btw, I once considered asking a family member. Having gone through actual DE, I’ve changed my position on that 100%. (I also believe that once you’ve gone through DE, and not just planned or talked about it, your feelings about it can and often do change, btw.) I have as much problem with a male family member as I do with a female. Society is much more accepting of female family member donation. Just tonight I found a study that noted that many times intrafamily sperm donation is kept a total secret. I believe that this is because of the taboo factor that I mentioned earlier, as well as men’s issues around infertility and how they deal with it.
- You very rightly concluded that I have a problem with the sexual ingredient in intrafamily gamete donation. It is the very heart of what I feel is an issue that has surreptitiously gained acceptable status and is being practiced without enough forethought. The study I found tonight also discussed this and the fact that we simply do not know what the impact of intrafamily gamete donation will have on society — and that it’s possibly a very serious one.
So, I disagree that you are a lazy reader. I maintain you did not understand my post, for whatever reason. And yes, I think we do disagree. Thank you very much for not calling me names, assuming what my political beliefs are or aren’t, or otherwise attacking me as you voiced your views on the matter.
Have you left a comment before? Because if you’re a long-time reader, I think this is the first time I’ve ever heard from you. And I’ve been blogging about DE for quite some time now.
I wish you the best of luck with your journey to a baby.
By: onwardandsideways on June 17, 2009
at 6:27 am
Interesting. At first glance I kind of shuddered, but my knee jerk reaction is that it’s very much like using your sister’s egg. In my mind if that’s OK – and I think it is – using your brother’s sperm (while surprising) is a logical extension. I wouldn’t choose to do it, but I have offered to be a surrogate for my brother-in-law… (I know, no blood relation, but similar in my book).
I don’t know if the pile on was due to group think on the forum – possibly it was. But it’s also possible that given the enormous emotional and psychological gymnastics that we go through to part with our own genetic material, that any method designed to preserve a modicum thereof is embraced.
By: squarepeg on June 17, 2009
at 2:41 pm
I used to be a “clicker” for Lost & Found, so I reported on donor egg/sperm blogs. I had a lot of blogs I checked in on, so it’s possible that this is the first time you’ve heard from me personally (embarrassing, and I apologize for not being more supportive while I was “clicking”).
I think where I lose your train of thought is when you imply that conception due to donation from a family member has a sexual connotation, but conception via an anonymous donor does not. Maybe that helps shed a light on my confusion.
Thanks for hearing me out.
-D.
By: D. on June 17, 2009
at 4:10 pm
Because sex with someone who is related to you is a taboo, not mention unhealthy. And when you conceive via gametes donated from someone who is related to you, it’s getting too close for comfort. Not to mention the confusion for a child.
I was researching this last night and found a couple of stories I found chilling: a grandfather who is his grandson’s genetic father. A brother who is his daughter’s genetic half-brother. I don’t see how people don’t get that this is shaky territory and would lead to complicated relationships at best, and very unhealthy lies and secrecy at the worst.
And I have to admit… you’ve been lurking here for a long time and it’s only when you disagree with something that you can bother to leave a comment? Something about that doesn’t sit right with me. Whatever.
By: onwardandsideways on June 17, 2009
at 4:20 pm
How thought provoking… almost too much for a hot Wednesday afternoon!
Personally, I see it as just like all the other donor gamete scenarios (or lines that can be drawn, to take from your title). Those of us who choose the donor gametes route have to sort out to see if what is right for their family. I understand how people who’ve never had to make a decision like this (you know the old adage, “to donor gamete or not to donor gamete, that is the question”) can feel uncomfortable with a scenario like this, but I feel that is because it’s someone else’s situation and not their own. Until you find yourself faced with a particular question, you do not know how that question would make you feel and what answer you’d come up with.
Genetic links are important to some and not to others. If a woman is using DE and does not have a male partner, and chooses to ask her brother to donate to provide the genetic link to her family, I do not see this as incest. To me it is a donor genetic material plus their family’s genetic material. Our situation can be put into a similar “math problem” — My husband and I chose to pursue pregnancy with known donor IUIs to have a genetic connection with both my family and my husband’s. My family + His family, which is exactly what it would have been in a perfect world (read: the one where our child would have been here a long, long time ago).
P.S. Glad everything is going so well with the bambino and you’ve figured out how to keep certain pg-related unpleasantries at bay. Oh, and if I ever experience pregnancy, I plan on renting a doppler… I say go for it!
By: Leslee on June 17, 2009
at 6:03 pm
Hi Leslee… thanks for commenting (nicely!)… lol
Just to clarify, I did not say that conception via intrafamily donor gametes is incest. I used some hyperbolic analogy around that, but if you read my post, I think you’ll see that I do not actually believe it is incest. I do, however, believe that it is unhealthy and potentially problematic.
I also agree with you that until one has actually experienced DE, you don’t really know what it’s like to go through it. And for the record, I had the opportunity to at least ask family members. When it came time to actually do that, my position on this began to clarify. Once I’d actually done a DE cycle, things clarified for me even more. Wasn’t sure if you were inferring that I hadn’t come up against the choice to use a family member or not, but in case you were, I actually did and chose not to go that route for all of the reasons I’ve mentioned above.
If you don’t mind sharing, are you planning to disclose to your child, should you have success?
I hope you get to experience pregnancy. It is the best, in spite of all the scary times and unknowns.
By: onwardandsideways on June 17, 2009
at 6:27 pm
I respect that your opinion is a valid one. However, I feel it’s about the love our family has for each other. Our situation has brought our whole entire family closer together — from the time of our diagnosis, through all of our failures, I’ve never felt alone in our grief.
Also, I was just saying that people don’t know until they’ve faced the situation as a general statement. I definitely don’t want you to feel I meant anything negative toward you.
And, yes, our child will know (over time, at age appropriate levels of course!). Even if our child comes into our family through adoption, he/she will learn about our pregnancy attempts, again when age appropriate. Keeping that from them would be keeping a huge part of our lives from them. I remember reading a while back that you plan to disclose — would you have disclosed if the donated embryo was from a known donor?
By: Leslee on June 17, 2009
at 7:03 pm
Leslie: I don’t disagree that this couldn’t bring a family closer together (and how lucky you are in that respect, it tears many apart) but I don’t think that precludes the possibility of intrafamily gamete donation causing serious problems, both for the family and the child.
At the very least, I I think it’s dangerous for a child to be taught that these connections don’t really matter and aren’t a big deal. It is a big deal if a boy’s father is also his half-sibling, etc.
And to claim otherwise is dangerous territory. We are denying fundamental biological truths in doing so. And yes, it’s very easy to just say ‘oh, it doesn’t matter’… but I think it does matter. Much in the way that it matters that technology has now invaded our lives. We won’t know just exactly how good or bad these things will be for quite some time. But my common sense says that messing with such basic, fundamental relationships is psychologically unhealthy and contributes to the breaking down of society and the nuclear family. It’s out of balance with nature and that is always a bad thing. We must not forget or lose respect for our fundamental connections to Mother Earth and her natural forces and rhythms. We have gotten so far off track by doing so.
And I didn’t think you meant anything negative, I was just clarifying.
And absolutely, we are in the disclosure camp and had we gone with a known donor that wouldn’t have changed. Although to clarify again, our embryo was not donated. Only the egg was. Our baby was conceived with a donor’s egg and my DH’s sperm.
By: onwardandsideways on June 17, 2009
at 7:20 pm
Oh, yes… Donor Egg is what I meant… sorry about that!
I agree with you — these connections matter, and are so important. Our child will know that their uncle had a role in his/her conception, but in no way would that change his role in our child’s life. He donated with the intention of my husband becoming a father, which is no different, when you boil it down to it’s simplest parts, than any other form of gamete donation whether anonymous or not. Except he will get to see the joy that fatherhood brings to my husband… something we all look forward to seeing sooner rather than later!
What forums are you posting on? I gave up on forums a long time ago… it was too much of a revolving door for me! Especially when things like what you experienced with this lady happened — someone would show up, post some crazy story one time, cause a huge rift in the otherwise , and never be heard from again!
I can only imagine the mess I’d be (and hopefully will be some day) during pregnancy… I was joking recently with a friend of mine that I won’t acknowledge that it’s really, truly happening until I’m pushing
Have you been feeling more active now that you’ve hit the 2nd trimester?
By: Leslee on June 17, 2009
at 7:52 pm
Question: do you think you can judge whether your child is going to be okay with your decision? I don’t think you can know that. Only he/she could answer that question. And I think even if they were raised in a household where this was all accepted, celebrated, etc., it doesn’t give them a chance to evaluate fairly whether or not they’re okay with having been conceived this way. Maybe when they’re an adult they can start to figure it out.
But this is exactly the problem: it doesn’t give the child an opportunity to do that in a neutral environment. And should they have internal conflicts over this that are then suppressed so that they can ‘fit in’ with the family or not disappoint mommy or daddy (or the uncle/dono)… it’s not good.
Granted our child will have the burden of understanding and how he/she will deal with their conception. But at least no blurry lines have been created that could cause psychological conflict. And yes, there could still be conflict (who’s my real mommy?) but it does not cross over into taboo or complicated relationships.
I don’t believe that simply because parents or society condone intrafamily conception that it makes it okay for the child. I believe we have deep-seated psychological needs, taboos, desires and barriers that are disturbed when we create children this way.
I’m going to post more thoughts about this at some points, maybe later today. This post – in spite of the flames – has generated a lot of thinking on my end.
I was posting on the Network54 DE board, sometimes referred to as the Yellow Board. I was really enjoying giving support to new, scared DE moms-to-be in spite of the cliquey atmosphere there. But this last episode really turned me off. I posted there about disclosure earlier in the year and they jumped all over me for that too. As long as you have no dissenting opinions there, it’s all good. If you do and dare to voice them, you’ll either be attacked or shunned. I noticed a distinct chill once I started voicing my thoughts. I wasn’t being ’supportive.’ What I’m supposed to lie or agree with you when I don’t? How is that being supportive?
It’s a fucking tough road for people like us to get to a baby… but damn, is it worth it. I do hope you get there soon, even if I disagree with how you’re doing it.
And thank goodness, yes, I’m feeling better. I’m starting to excercise a bit. Yesterday was the first day in months that I did not require an afternoon nap. And food has never tasted so good.
By: onwardandsideways on June 17, 2009
at 8:42 pm
No, I cannot judge what my child will think. But my opinion is that the difference between known and anonymous isn’t as great as you feel. And I’m fine with that difference of opinion.
And yes, I too have had a lot of thoughts running through my head today after reading your post and talking back and forth. It’s further solidified me in the decisions I’ve made, and I’d venture to guess it’s done the same for you and the decisions you’ve made.
Thanks very much for allowing this discourse… sorry for taking over your comments. And thanks for getting my juices flowing after a long hot day! I certainly hope I came across as the “grey” (as in black vs. white) person I am, and I hope didn’t offend you despite our differences of opinion.
Crossing my fingers you continue feeling better! I’ve always heard the 2nd trimester is the best!
By: Leslee on June 17, 2009
at 9:08 pm
No offense whatsoever, Leslee. I appreciate the chance to discuss with you without it degenerating. Which is more than I can say for a few others in this comment thread. Ahem.
Thanks for the good wishes. Someone commented a while back that the trimesters were: weary, cheery and dreary. Pretty accurate, from what I hear.
By: onwardandsideways on June 17, 2009
at 9:20 pm
Wow. I thought you wanted to spark discussion, and I think overall I’ve been very civil in seeking clarification and expressing my opinions.
I did apologize for not being more supportive when I was a reporting clicker for Lost and Found, but if you want to email Melissa at Stirrup Queens she can, in fact, vouch for me.
I’m not sure if you’re point was that I was lying about my history with your blog or that I’m just a jerk who wanted to mess with you.
Neither is true, and I’m very sorry that I’ve offended you. I won’t comment again.
-D.
By: D. on June 18, 2009
at 1:53 am
Something tells me you wouldn’t have commented again regardless. Which is why I said what I said. Tata!
By: onwardandsideways on June 18, 2009
at 3:28 am
First, I don’t think there is really any difference between donor sperm from your brother and donor egg from your sister (as long as sperm + egg are not bio-related).
Second, my sister offered me her eggs and I would have used them in a heartbeat if only she weren’t… 5 years older than me. I would way rather have used eggs from someone I know, love, and interact with regularly than from a stranger, because it would have given my child the opportunity to know their donor and to have a special relationship with them, if they chose.
Yes, it means the family relationships will be different than they would be otherwise. But the studies of donor children show consistently that they would really like to (1) know a lot about and often (2) get to know personally and sometimes (3) have a relationship with their donor. I think with a known donor you have to choose the donor extremely carefully to make sure this would work psychologically. In my case my sister has never had any desire whatsoever to have kids, and I think she would be more fascinated and befuddled by however I raised the child than likely to try to step into some kind of pseudo-mother role.
I think a useful comparison point for donor conception is adoption (since in some ways DE/DS is like ‘half an adoption’, although obviously there are some major differences as well). Would it be considered incestuous or otherwise evil if my sister or brother conceived a child and were unable to take care of it, and I adopted it? No, I would in fact probably be lauded for keeping the child in the family. Would the family relationships be complicated because there were multiple parents in the same family? Yes, sure, but families negotiate that kind of thing all the time.
In general, it is well known in adoption that kids generally (not in every circumstance, but generally) fare better if they can maintain relationships with both their birth family and their adoptive family, and that adoptive families are generally very happy with the relationship. And, yes, it makes family relationships more complicated, but in all the balance is to the good.
By: Nishkanu on June 19, 2009
at 12:02 pm
Oh my, I missed out by being the first commenter.
I read some of the comments and had no idea it would be so touchy.
I thought of another way to look at it and hope it wasn’t already addressed.
Let’s say your brother had a one night stand with someone you don’t know. She died in childbirth and your brother was not capable of raising his child so you adopted her. Would that be a big deal? I’m not saying it wouldn’t be tricky explaining why your bio dad is in the role of uncle, but I think it could be done in a thoughtful manner.
I think we will be learning more about how people feel to be donor conceived as time goes on. The problem is that how will YOUR kid feel? Some will want to meet their donor, others won’t – do you find a known donor just in case? What if you don’t have that option?
And my YOUR, I don’t mean you . . . I mean the hypothetical “you”.
Perhaps all of us are being selfish to want a kid even if it means being creative on how that happens. I hope our child(ren) will understand and be accepting of it.
By: Kami on June 22, 2009
at 6:58 pm